|
Whether you are a web designer, or have worked with web design vendors, the web
design business has changed greatly over the last few years. While there has been
great change in this marketplace, there are a few main streams which are developing,
most of which are positive trends for the independent web consultant.
Larger Fortune 500 firms now have handed most of the responsibility for web
work to their internal Information Technology (IT) depts. While marketing continues
to have a say, IT will make most of the vendor decisions. This is a shift which
could be problematic for web design shops or individual consultants if they
have traditionally dealt with marketing departments and maintained those relationships.
Marketing and IT departments have traditionally been at odds within most companies.
Many web design firms may not have the technical breadth and depth to be IT
consultants; therefore they have never really built strong ties with IT. Since
they have not built these ties, it becomes more difficult to gain business from
IT departments. However, many independent consultants who moved into the web
space do have an IT background, and therefore they can easily make the transition
to becoming a consultant to an IT dept.
As the web moves beyond the brochureware stage for these clients, as they provide
more functionality; they are more and more intertwined with their legacy systems.
As they become more connected to the business systems, the standard bearer of
business systems, IT, becomes more involved. As IT becomes more involved, they
will tend to turn to the contractors they have been using: usually independent
IT consultants or larger consulting firms which they may already have on board
to do other IT consulting work.
The web is moving from medium to application. As it moves from medium to application,
the user experience becomes part of an application, as opposed to the user experience
being the application. For example, when the web was young, the web was more
of a medium: similar to TV and radio, it was not that interactive, and while
there was some interactivity, this interactivity was usually not interconnected
to core business practices. The look and feel, the interface, the ultimate user
experience was the goal to hit. In a few cases, there was a defined task flow
which the user could follow, but in the early days, users were more expected
to explore than to be guided.
Now, as the web becomes more of an application, the look and feel is not as
important as being able to assist the user to complete the task at hand, a skill
which requires more than adept graphic design (which does help but is not the
whole picture)
Ad-hoc interface standards have now emerged: it is no longer necessary to come
up with new interfaces and task flows every time: standard web paradigms have
emerged which can be and should be reused in new designs. For example: a product
company website should have these standard navigation items: products, support,
customers, about us, contact us.
As budgets tighten, clients no longer see a vast difference between larger
web design shops such as Scient and Razorfish, 2-5 person firms, or even independent
consultants, working from their homes with very low overhead and able to provide
similar services at lower cost.
As big web shops have dissolved into breakaway smaller shops with the same
personnel, these breakaway shops have been able to take and complete business
the original shop could not complete profitably. In some cases, independent
consultants can do the same work at a much lower cost by pulling together an
ad-hoc team of developers to work on a project by project basis.
What we are seeing is the commoditization of the web design experience.
The larger web design firms are seeing lot of competition from small 2-5 person
shops, or independent contractors, working from their homes, with low overhead
and/or off-shore resources, being able to compete on price, and stealing contracts
from larger web design shops on that basis.
Large companies, facing budget cuts, are no longer interested in dealing only
with name brand firms: A Fortune 500 such as Cisco is just as happy to deal
with Brand X Design as they are with Razorfish, because when you put the end-result
designs side-by-side, they cant see the difference to justify the cost.
While there usually is small dissimilarity in quality and usability, to the
layperson, this difference does not present itself as enough of a value-add
for the added cost.
Small firms or independent web consultants are taking over the space the big
boys used to play in and are doing it profitably. The moral of this story is:
dont be afraid of going for the bigger clients: in this marketplace, even
the bigger companies are looking to small firms and other free agents: as long
as you produce a professional design and have the right skills: you can compete
with the big boys, and in this economy, win on price and still do great work,
both for your clients and for your portfolio.
About the Author:
Chris Kalaboukis is currently CTO of SwapSmarts.com - http://swapsmarts.com.
Chris has 17+ years of experience in internet, information technology and business
development. Prior to SwapSmarts, he has worked with FedEx, Morgan Stanley &
Sun Microsystems on web design, Bell Mobility and Phone.com on wireless initiatives,
Excite@Home & Shaw Communications on high-speed internet cable modem deployment
and for Cineplex Odeon on advertising data systems. |