|
When browsing classified ads, the first task is to choose the best periodicals
or websites. This can be trickier than it sounds because there are thousands
of ‘sources’ on the market today. Browsers need to weigh the potential
value of each source against the associated time and monetary costs. In so doing,
they need to be aware of any editions aimed at special interests or locations,
and their issue dates. Then browsers need to buy the latest correct editions,
or find the best websites and join any membership schemes they impose.
Having selected their sources, browsers should begin with the index, if one
exists. Often, only the larger and more sophisticated sources have sufficient
adverts to justify indexes. If they don’t justify one, it’s usually
necessary to read long lists of adverts arranged in alphabetical order. If the
source is large and the indexing is good, it’s possible to go straight
to the main class or sub-class for the adverts of interest. Browsers need to
be wary of all the other interesting classes though, which may tempt the unwary
off-task, towards the dark, dark world of impulse purchasing. Static classes
labelled ‘Computers & Internet’ are tempting enough for the author.
Dynamic classes like ‘Hot ads’ on websites are irresistible.
Staying in the light and firmly on-task, it’s now possible to focus on
the main advert class or sub-class of interest. Browsing, at least initially,
should be broad and shallow, to ensure that all of the purchasing options are
considered on merit. From this research, it should be possible to generate a
list of buying criteria, ranging from essential ‘must have’, to desirable
‘could have’ points. This, in turn, could lead to the best make and
model. The beauty of browsing is its very ‘weightlessness’, for want
of a better word. Effective browsers scan classified ad captions quickly, skim
their descriptions, and only dally when a criterion or interesting product warrants
notation. Adverts classified wrongly are skipped easily.
Browsers’ weightlessness is handicapped though when there is insufficient
colour contrast between the paper (background) and text (foreground). Light
grey text on lighter grey paper, for example. Other grave handicaps include
inappropriate font, and font size, selections; right text justification in columns
and display boxes; and other awkward spacing arrangements to do with ‘leading’.
Classified ads written solely in italic or emboldened text, and/or with every
word underlined, are similarly difficult to read. Those classifieds composed
with capitals letters seem intimidating. Whilst those composed with tiny, or
extremely tiny, fonts seem too timid to be worthy of much attention.
Whatever happened to short sentences or phrases? Whatever became of correct
spelling in classified ads? These qualities complement browsing and illustrate
that advertisers care about customers. This said, it appears acceptable to forego
some points of grammar and punctuation. To some extent, they seem less important
than clear typography, brief sentences and accurate spelling.
Let’s turn now to page layout. What’s needed for effective and efficient
browsing is ‘white space’ in which to make notes, or give the eyes
some respite. What sources often present are adverts crammed into every square
centimetre, especially amongst their ‘free’ ads. Even when advertisers
opt for display box upgrades to their freebies, the results aren’t much
better. Browsers need to be aware that many of these ‘free’ and cheap
ads are constrained artificially by their sources. Hence, browsers may not find
many nearly new BMW cars advertised in low-cost adverts. Perhaps this is because
cramped ads, sometimes known as ‘wallpaper ads’, seem to merge into
one grey blur, if browsers stare at them for too long. Browsing free and cheap
ads for inexpensive commodities may require several short sessions.
When browsing classified ads generally, it’s necessary to be aware of
the sophisticated tactics that frequent advertisers employ, often the chaps
with big budgets to spend. What they’re offering may be inferior to the
occasional advertisers with low budgets, in terms of value for money. Browsers
need to look past the gaudy colours and expensive photographs therefore, that
are deployed skilfully to divert them along predetermined paths.
Browsers need to be aware too that ‘trade’, ‘paid-for’
ads are likely to monopolise the best page positions. Moreover, several versions
of more expensive adverts may appear on different pages, in different positions,
at different times, to weaken browsers’ defences. Sometimes it’s hard
to see past all the window dressing, to find out what’s really on offer
and judge whether professionally presented offers really meet browsers’
needs, time scales and budgets.
Some advertisers – occasional and frequent alike - make boastful claims
containing superlatives, subjectivity and exclamation marks. Such posturing
may also monopolise unwary browsers’ attention. Instead, browsers should
be attracted by, and interested in, unpretentious presentations of fact; presentations
that explain the benefits of goods or services; presentations that satisfy the
emotions underpinning browsers’ need to browse.
Whilst listing buying criteria and deciding which product to buy, the coarse
and fine filtration of classified ads is important. So is the ability to sort
and re-sort adverts, perhaps in reverse order. Fixed, alphabetical listings
are okay but not always the best. Browsers need to compare like offers and this
is easier if important information is provided in consistent formats, and in
close proximity. Standardisation on metric measurements for example, would be
useful.
The reverse engineering of browse results is important in other regards. For
example, browsers might want to see adverts from particular locations only.
Classified ad websites with database technology are increasingly allowing browsers
to create unusual classes: user-determined classes like ‘UK Postcode NN8
2ZH’, not just source-determined classes like ‘Motors’.
With their brains in gear, browsers should be able to note down essential and
desirable properties; maybe a specific product’s make and model number.
At this point, they can switch to Search mode, to find the best price, availability
and supplier.
For the sources of classified ads, this article suggests a number of presentational
qualities that support worthwhile browsing, some of which only apply to printed
sources, some only to websites:
Make edition information clear, especially if editions cover special interests.
If sources are large in volume, provide page indexes to all classifications.
Enforce high typography, page format and English standards that support text
scanning and skimming. Provide sufficient ‘white space’, even amongst
‘free’ and cheap ads. Allow the small guys to compete with the big
guys; strive for fair and open competition. Curb boastful ads; ask for evidence
that pretentious statements are honest and truthful. Provide tools to filter,
sort and reverse engineer browse results.
About the Author:
© Steve Hawker 2005. All rights reserved. Steve is a partner at http://www.ehawker.co.uk,
the small ads search engine. E-mail him at: info@ehawker.co.uk |
